PENGARUH PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM, PENGALAMAN AUDITOR, WHISTLEBLOWING, DAN RED FLAGS TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PENDETEKSIAN KECURANGAN ( FRAUD ) OLEH AUDITOR

(Study Empiris Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik (KAP) di Wilayah Jakarta Selatan Tahun 2018)

  • Conni Novita Sari UNIVERSITAS BUDI LUHUR
  • Anita Wahyu Indrasti UNIVERSITAS BUDI LUHUR

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of professional skepticism, auditor experience, whistleblowing and red flags on the ability to detect fraud by the auditor. The population in this study is the auditor who works at the Public Accounting Office (KAP) in the South Jakarta area. The sampling technique uses convenience sampling. This research data was obtained from a questionnaire that had been previously shared with the auditors working at the Public Accounting Firm (KAP) in the South Jakarta area. The type of data used is primary data. The method of data collection is a survey, using a questionnaire. The analysis tool uses multiple linear regression. The results showed that the experience of auditors, whistleblowing and red flags did not significantly influence the ability of fraud detection by auditors, whereas professional skepticism had a significant effect on the ability to detect fraud by auditors. The value of the determination coefficient obtained is 0.236, which means that the independent variables used in this research model are able to explain 23.6% variation in the dependent variable and the remaining 76.4% is explained by other variables outside of this study.

Published
2019-02-01
How to Cite
SARI, Conni Novita; INDRASTI, Anita Wahyu. PENGARUH PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM, PENGALAMAN AUDITOR, WHISTLEBLOWING, DAN RED FLAGS TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PENDETEKSIAN KECURANGAN ( FRAUD ) OLEH AUDITOR. Akuntansi Responsibilitas Audit dan Tax, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 01, feb. 2019. ISSN 2252-6226. Available at: <https://jom.fe.budiluhur.ac.id/index.php/jma/article/view/242>. Date accessed: 22 may 2024.